From: YourName@YourISP.com   
      
   In article <69f04b6f-c4b6-4b6b-bc98-24e2c7301ee2@googlegroups.com>,   
   jack  wrote:   
   > On Monday, March 14, 2016 at 8:24:04 PM UTC-4, Your Name wrote:   
   > > In article <0000012c@net396.fidonet.org>, Jimmy Anderson   
   > > <@p0.f45.n396.z1[ASC46]fidonet[.]org> wrote:   
   > > > >   
   > > > > The first ting is the Dinos are great.  The second thing is   
   > > > > there's a fat white guy you just cant wait to se get his.   
   > > > > Third there's two brats that make it.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > So yeah, it's Jurasic Park with more noise.   
   > > >   
   > > > I finally saw this over the weekend. Not something I'll watch   
   > > > over and over, but I enjoyed it!   
   > >   
   > > I haven't seen Jurassic World, but a lot of reviews say it is just yet   
   > > another in the massive list of pointless and silly reboots Hollyweird   
   > > keeps churning out these days. To misquote: "Talent has left the   
   > > building."   :-(   
   >   
   > It's not a re-boot exactly, but a sequel to Jurassic Park that somehow   
   > ignores Jurassics 2 & 3.   
      
   It pretends to be a sequel, but in reality is jut a silly reboot ...   
   just like JJ Abrams' crappy "Star Wars The Force Awakens", just like   
   Beavis & Butthead's pretend prequel "Enterprise".   
      
   The problem is that there's almost nobody left in Hollyweird with the   
   creative talent to actually create something new or fitting, so they   
   make all these idiotic reboots instead and lazily crap all over the   
   hard work by their predecessors.   :-(   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)