From: YourName@YourISP.com
In article , Dimensional Traveler
wrote:
> On 6/11/2016 10:40 PM, Your Name wrote:
> > In article , Dimensional Traveler
> > wrote:
> >> On 6/11/2016 7:22 PM, Tim Bruening wrote:
> >>> On Thursday, June 9, 2016 at 2:11:34 PM UTC-7, Your Name wrote:
> >>>> In article ,
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>> On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 8:57:18 PM UTC-7, Your Name wrote:
> >>>>>> In article <7b85ccf7-fa9d-491d-bc0a-21c849a4aeda@googlegroups.com>,
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> When Mark was removing pieces from the Aries 4 MAV, it looked to me
> >>>>>>> like the pieces were falling as fast as they would on Earth!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> That's because they made the movie on Earth. ;-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> But the producers were able to simulate zero gravity on the Hermes.
> >>>>
> >>>> It's easier to simulate in a small space (or even filmed in reality
> >>>> using the "Vomit Comet"). It requires attaching everything to wires on
> >>>> an overhead gantry system or filming underwater, which is far more
> >>>> difficult and cumbersome in a wide open space than inside a studio. The
> >>>> only other way is to digitally add the pieces in post-production, which
> >>>> makes it difficult for actor interaction.
> >>>
> >>> How did they simulate the balls of water floating in the Hermes as a crew
> >>> member cartwheeled and ate them?
> >>
> >> CGI water.
> >
> > Yep, or booking time on a "Vomit Comet" plane ride.
>
> You'd have to paint the inside that special shade of blue so you can
> insert the CGI background then. CGI water would be cheaper I think.
It depends on what is being filmed. In some cases they simply build a
set of the spacecraft interior inside a "Vomit Comet" plane - then no
CGI is needed at all.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
