Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.movies    |    Discussing SF motion pictures    |    28,343 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 27,259 of 28,343    |
|    Lynn McGuire to J. Clarke    |
|    Re: Passengers    |
|    04 Jan 17 19:23:42    |
      From: lynnmcguire5@gmail.com              On 12/22/2016 7:33 PM, J. Clarke wrote:       >       > This doesn't seem to be getting any love from       > anybody and it's a shame. It's the third solid       > SF movie to come along this year and movies that       > are real SF and don't degenerate into horror are       > rare. The story would have fit into the pages       > one of the major Prozines just fine. It starts       > with a (given that one has a working sleeper       > starship) plausible premise and everything flows       > from there. It seems to get chalked for turning       > into "romantic comedy" but there's nothing funny       > about the way the romance goes--I'm guessing       > that that criticism comes from people who have       > never gone past the Golden Age of Science       > Fiction (12). Could it have been better? Yes--       > IMO it's main failing is that it didn't have       > time to tell the story it was telling--there       > were three major stories going at the same       > time--the relationship between Jim and Aurora,       > their coping with being alone for the rest of       > their lives, and the failing of the ship's       > systems. Any of those could have made a movie       > of this length in itself, but doing all three       > short-changed all of them. I don't know if       > another hour would have helped (I'd love to see       > a director's cut that fleshes out the stories       > though) or if it really needed to be a mini-       > series.       >       > I'd really like this to make enough that more       > movies of this general nature get made but sadly       > it looks like it's going to end up losing money.       >       > The original script is I understand somewhat       > different and not (from a genre viewpoint) in a       > good way.       >       > I can't help thinking that it should never have       > been put up against Rogue One, which IMO is the       > best installment in the Star Wars franchise       > since Empire Strikes Back.              I have yet to see "Passengers" but I have seen "Rogue One" twice. "Rogue One"       for me is the best movie of 2016 with "Deadpool" a       very close second. Or maybe "The Secret Life of Pets" is second for me.        Howard Taylor does not even come close to agreeing with me       either:        http://www.schlockmercenary.com/pages/2016-movies/              Lynn              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca