Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.movies    |    Discussing SF motion pictures    |    28,343 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 27,311 of 28,343    |
|    jack to All    |
|    Re: A quick review of Wonder Woman    |
|    06 Jun 17 06:58:23    |
      From: jrs9jrs9@gmail.com              Some thoughts -- all spoilers.       x       x       x       x       x       x       x       x       x       x       x              I really enjoyed the movie; one of the better superhero films made and       certainly a redemption for DC for the tepid BvS.               Well written, for the most part, and acted with restraint; it would have been       easy to go way over board with the themes in the movies. The Amazons are       powerful but not invulnerable, which was a bit of a surprise. The       introduction of Diana to English        society and the overwhelming maleness of the war office could have turned into       a rant or a sorrowful display of misogyny but the interactions was handled       well and with humor. That was a bit unexpected, all the humor, bordering       almost on slapstick at        times, especially Diana double-entendring question about Steve's watch.        One thing of interest: the label "Wonder Woman" is never used in the movie.        WW is called Diana, Princess Diana, or Diana Prince, and that's it. I was       cringingly expecting that at some point Steve or one of his buddies would       having watched Diana in full        gear to say a la Lois Lane, "why you must be some kind of...wonder...woman" or       something to that effect. Thankfully no, and I hope the character is never       referred to by that silly name.              Now as the less-well written part: the finale. I guess a movie like this has       to have a slam-bang blow-everything-up last act involving the main heroine and       the super villain and perhaps a sacrifice along the way for inspiration for       the heroine, but this        is rather boilerplate and WW just went along with it. It was great to see       David Thewlis turn out to be Ares (especially as he is currently co-starring       in Fargo right now), but the writers just ripped off Magneto shamelessly,       right down to the helmet,        levitating, and ability to toss around heavy objects just with his mind.       Calling on lightning was his one big innovation. And poor Steve's sacrifice;       I guess it was necessary to give Diana that final psychic energy to defeat       Ares, but still, there must        have been parachutes in the plane, they were in Belgium and the plane was       plenty stocked with fuel enough to take it over the North Sea and let Steve       parachute to safety, but nope he blows himself up along with the poison gas.        I do say though that Steve'       s expression when he knew he had the plane to himself and his initial       hesitation to destroy himself was played so well. And Gail Gadot, i did not       notice this when I saw BvS but she could be Angeline Jolie's younger sister       and I bet if this movie came        out twenty years ago she'd have played Diana. Gadot handled the role       carefully, her naivety of the ways of the human world and her slow initiation       to the fact that evil exists outside of any one individual came off as       believable.               Question: Is Diana invulnerable? We see her toss around many heavy objects,       like a tank, and destroy buildings and such, she could leap with the force of       the Hulk, she has the force to hold off with her shield the force of several       machine guns firing        at her, and I wonder if the forearm shields were more for show but she did not       know that. She is not an Amazon per se and what powers did Zeus actually give       her? I think we did not want to see bullets bouncing off of her like with       Superman but I wonder        if they could.               --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca