home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.arts.sf.movies      Discussing SF motion pictures      28,343 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 27,323 of 28,343   
   Your Name to Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy   
   Re: "Interstellar"   
   21 Jun 17 13:24:41   
   
   From: YourName@YourISP.com   
      
   On 2017-06-20 23:43:47 +0000, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy said:   
   > "J. Clarke"  wrote in   
   > news:MPG.33b37bd99e1afcbe98ad9e@news.eternal-september.org:   
   >>   
   >> 2001 is a classic.  Interstellar misses the mark by a wide   
   >> margin.   
   >   
   > 2001 is widely acknoeldged as a classic. This does not necessarily   
   > mean it is a "great" film or even a good one. Just a classic.   
   > Interstellar is neither, by most accounts.   
      
   "Classic" is almost always a term applied to boring old rubbish that   
   arty-farty morons and braindead "critics" want to force kids to   
   poinltessly study at school. Shakespeare's drivel are other "great"   
   examples of a "classic".  :-\   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca