XPost: rec.arts.movies.current-films   
   From: ted@loft.tnolan.com   
      
   In article ,   
   Your Name   wrote:   
   >On 2017-08-19 02:05:20 +0000, J. Clarke said:   
   >> In article , taustinca@gmail.com   
   >> says...   
   >>> Your Name  wrote in   
   >>> news:on7r1a$1snq$2@gioia.aioe.org:   
   >>>>   
   >>>> After the (rumoured) stupidity of pointlessly shovelling the   
   >>>> Death Star in the Han Solo movie, I don't hold much hope for any   
   >>>> of these new Diseny-made Star Wars movies.   :-(   
   >>>   
   >>> It really took you that long to realize it's all going to be crap?   
   >>>   
   >>> The first clue was "Disney now owns Star Wars." The absolute proof   
   >>> was their announcement that they're going to be releasing 87 new   
   >>> titles per month for the next five thousand years, with everything   
   >>> single one coming with a complete line of toys and other (non-)   
   >>> collectible.   
   >>>   
   >>> Seriously, dude, what the hell did you expect?   
   >>   
   >> Rogue One wasn't at all bad.  But it was a war movie, not a fairy tale.   
   >   
   >It was okay-ish ... but there was something not quite "Star Warsy"   
   >about it. It didn't quite fit into the franchise style properly, but I   
   >can't pinpoint exactly why.   
   >   
      
   Because everybody died?   
      
   --   
   ------   
   columbiaclosings.com   
   What's not in Columbia anymore..   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)