From: droleary@2017usenet1.subsume.com   
      
   For your reference, records indicate that   
   Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy  wrote:   
      
   > Doc O'Leary   wrote in   
   > news:onca8t$t3h$1@dont-email.me:   
   >   
   > > Speaking in the generic, a single-minded pursuit of any goal   
   > > will often get a person into trouble.  Most people benefit by   
   > > getting the input of several alternative viewpoints, especially   
   > > from parties that are more objective on the matter.   
   >   
   > A reasonable, if irrelevant, thought.   
      
   I think starting with general principles is often very relevant.   
      
   > But that still doesn't answer the question of why Lucas, or anyone   
   > else, should give a fuck about what YourName thinks Lucas should do   
   > with his property.   
      
   Well, it’s not Lucas’ property any longer, so the whole debate is   
   pointless.  The only interesting question would be whether or not   
   Lucas considered *similar* viewpoints before he made his decision to   
   sell it to Disney.  If I had a multi-billion dollar decision on the   
   line, I would like to think I’d like to have as many perspectives as   
   possible at my disposal, all the way down to something an idiot like   
   YourName might say.  Selling Star Wars (or any other huge franchise)   
   is the kind of process I’d like to see a documentary about.   
      
   --   
   "Also . . . I can kill you with my brain."   
   River Tam, Trash, Firefly   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)