XPost: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.movies.current-films
From: YourName@YourISP.com
On 2017-12-20 15:31:44 +0000, Dimensional Traveler said:
> On 12/19/2017 10:23 PM, Your Name wrote:
>> On 2017-12-20 05:50:37 +0000, Dimensional Traveler said:
>>> On 12/19/2017 9:32 PM, Your Name wrote:
>>>> On 2017-12-20 04:41:25 +0000, BTR1701 said:
>>>>> In article ,
>>>>> Your Name wrote:
>>>>>> On 2017-12-19 20:24:54 +0000, TT said:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Clone Wars was of course all about callbacks, good vs evil,
>>>>>>> master-apprentice etc. I don't think you can make Star Wars without
>>>>>>> that stuff.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Rogue One" managed without an Master-Apprentice ... in fact it had
>>>>>> almost no Force stuff in it at all (the exception was the blind
>>>>>> character).
>>>>>
>>>>> And Vader.
>>>>
>>>> Doesn't really count seeing as he was only in it at the end.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> The flashy trio of (prequel) films featured characters from
>>>>>> the original movies - Yoda, Obi-Wan, Chewbacca, a younger Darth
>>>>>> Vader
>>>>>
>>>>> Don't forget a younger Luke and Leia, too.
>>>>
>>>> Definitely don't count since they had no lines. ;-)
>>>
>>> I am NOT going back to rewatch that one to see if they cried as babies.
>>
>> They did cry in the birth sequence, since that's how movies / TV shows
>> always signify a new baby is alive.
>>
>
> So they _did_ have lines.
Crying isn't "lines" ... it's "directing". It's the same as having the
script with the directing pointer "(laughs)". It's not a "line", just
something the actor needs to do.
In the case of the babies, they probably didn't cry, at least not
on-cue. The cries were most likely added in post-production and come
from different babies.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
