XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written   
   From: YourName@YourISP.com   
      
   On 2018-04-30 03:21:29 +0000, Paul Colquhoun said:   
   > On Mon, 30 Apr 2018 14:19:52 +1200, Your Name  wrote:   
   > |>   
   > |> environment where life can arise, and its not a rare one. Can you   
   > |> present an argument for looking elsewhere, and suggest what we   
   > |> should look for?   
   > |   
   > | Ah, so scientists are not only blinkered fools, they're also lazy scum   
   > | who can't do the job their paid to do ... it's the general public who   
   > | has to come up with all the ideas for them.  :-\   
   >   
   > They get enough criticism for "wasting money" by looking for the signs   
   > we can recognise. Just think of the reception when they start looking   
   > for life-signs they "just made up".   
   >   
   > Lose-Lose situation.   
      
   They already waste piles of money on silly "studies" that simply   
   confirm the patently obvious. There was a report of an idiotic study in   
   the weekend newspaper that (surprise, surprise!) young kids have more   
   energy than adults.   :-\   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)