XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written
From: noone@nowhere.com
On 05/05/18 12:56, David Johnston wrote:
> On 2018-05-04 5:31 PM, Your Name wrote:
>> On 2018-05-04 22:21:54 +0000, Gene Wirchenko said:
>>> On Fri, 4 May 2018 18:39:54 +1200, Your Name
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 2018-05-04 06:09:04 +0000, Thomas Koenig said:
>>>>> Your Name schrieb:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's not just water of course, they're stuck on the blinkered idea
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> life elsewhere must be like life on Earth, so to them that means
>>>>>> water,
>>>>>
>>>>> So, again: What alternate solvent do you propose? Please note it
>>>>> should be thermodynamically stable, available (under reasonable
>>>>> conditions) in large quantities and sufficient purity.
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course, it should also permit the sort of hydrophilic/hydrophobic
>>>>> interactions (or, for a non-polar solvent, lipophilic/lipophobic)
>>>>> that make water such a good candidate for life.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please show that you have at least a miniscule fraciton of a clue
>>>>> what you are actually talking about when accusing scientists of
>>>>> being lazy.
>>>>
>>>> Yet another disptick with reading comprehension issues. :-\
>>>
>>> That would seem to be more appicable to you.
>>>
>>> If you think that so many people do not understand you, maybe,
>>> just maybe, you are the one at fault.
>>
>> Nope. It's because far too many people do not actually read what's
>> written .
>
> Right. If they read what you wrote, they'd know that you know nothing
> and hence not bother to ask you a question.
Exactly.
But, like Quadiblock, he is so stupid that posters try to help him by
giving a serious reply. (But I quite enjoy the replies which usually
inform me in some subject I know little about so I don't want to
complain too loudly.)
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
