home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.arts.sf.movies      Discussing SF motion pictures      28,343 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 27,575 of 28,343   
   Dimensional Traveler to moviePig   
   Re: "Unrestoring" 2001: A Space Odyssey   
   20 May 18 21:37:36   
   
   XPost: rec.arts.movies.past-films   
   From: dtravel@sonic.net   
      
   On 5/20/2018 7:39 PM, moviePig wrote:   
   > On 5/20/2018 7:13 PM, super70s wrote:   
   >> Some relevant passages from a EW piece:   
   >>   
   >> "Christopher Nolan may be the only working director qualified to   
   >> reexamine Stanley Kubrick's 1968 sci-fi masterpice, which Nolan has   
   >> carefully 'unrestored' to its original photo format for an extraordinary   
   >> theatrical rerelease unlike any other 50th anniversary."   
   >>   
   >> "EW: For someone who's never seen this film, why should they make a   
   >> point to see it in this special format?"   
   >> "CN: ...What we're doing is putting it out there in its original 70mm   
   >> photochemical analog glory to give audiences in 2018 the same   
   >> experiences that audiences had in 1968."   
   >> "EW: Which scenes most benefit from 'unrestoration'?"   
   >> "CN: The entire film is so much more heightened, the color particularly.   
   >> There are things that appear to you in a revelatory way."   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> I'm not exactly getting the point of this, they go to so much trouble to   
   >> restore iconic films like this one, Gone With the Wind, The Wizard of   
   >> Oz, etc., in digital format and I thought the whole point of that was   
   >> for "heightened color" and a sharper picture (which you often see   
   >> demonstrated in a split screen comparison).   
   >>   
   >> I only have the original MGM/WB DVD release so I guess I'm stuck with   
   >> the "inferior restored" version, lol.   
   >   
   > 1.  The '68 'audience experience' also entailed a wraparound Cinerama   
   > screen, which was very way damn cool.  Even Imax won't do that today.   
   >   
   > 2.  There's nothing about '70mm photochemical analog' that can't be   
   > improved upon by high-res digital.  It's physics, not Holy Communion.   
   >   
   It is when your religion is CINEMA!   
      
   --   
   Inquiring minds want to know while minds with a self-preservation   
   instinct are running screaming.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca