Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.movies    |    Discussing SF motion pictures    |    28,343 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 27,677 of 28,343    |
|    mimus99 to Dimensional Traveler    |
|    Re: Blade Runner 2049 Bad Review    |
|    29 Apr 19 18:18:08    |
      XPost: alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk       From: mimus99@gmail.com              On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 13:58:54 -0700, Dimensional Traveler wrote:              > On 4/29/2019 1:38 PM, mimus99 wrote:       >> On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 15:51:01 -0500, Lynn McGuire wrote:       >>       >>> On 4/22/2019 4:34 PM, mimus99 wrote:       >>>       >>>> _ Blade Runner _ is one of my favorite movies of all time, with only two       >>>> acts of mercy in the whole film, one by mistake (Gaff letting Rachel live,       >>>> thinking she was lifespan-limited).       >>>>       >>>> So I finally sat down with the DVD of _ Blade Runner 2049 _, and I tried,       >>>> Ubiq knows I tried, to watch it, but I gave up after an hour and a half       >>>> (into about 2:40).       >>>>       >>>> In that time, and being as charitable as possible, there might've been a       >>>> half-hour's worth of plot.       >>>>       >>>> The eye-candy and score were both inferior to the original.       >>>>       >>>> And everybody kept talking in these flat, hushed monotones all through,       >>>> like they were in a fucking cathedral or something (and not one on fire).       >>>>       >>>> A treatment like this would've made even my suggested sequel, based on       >>>> Cordwainer Smith's "The Dead Lady of Clown Town", dull.       >>>       >>> I watched it last weekend also. Total drivel. There was no plot and I       >>> did not understand the ending whatsoever.       >>       >> Well, one can always watch _ Alien Opponent _ (2010) again.       >       > I liked 'Blade Runner 2049'. I didn't have any problem following the story.              I had no problem following the story, I was just bored, where not repelled       by, say, the pathetic holographic relationship, and the casual and       senseless knifing of a new replicant by our arch-villain (Tyrell II or       wotever).              Which brings up the deeper point that it was hard to suspend disbelief in       the replicant industry even in _ Blade Runner _, but it was much harder to       believe that the subhumanization of replicants would still be going on       umpteen years later (which is what suggested TDLoCT to me as a good       candidate for a basis for a sequel):              Replicant rights!              --              If it can ask for a lawyer,       ball-game over.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca