Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.movies    |    Discussing SF motion pictures    |    28,343 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 27,698 of 28,343    |
|    Your Name to Your Name    |
|    Re: 2001 remake    |
|    18 May 19 19:34:14    |
      From: YourName@YourISP.com              On 2019-05-18 06:04:51 +0000, Your Name said:       > On 2019-05-18 04:37:21 +0000, Dimensional Traveler said:       >> On 5/17/2019 7:11 PM, Your Name wrote:       >>> On 2019-05-18 01:20:19 +0000, bruce56@topmail.co.nz said:       >>>>       >>>> would anybody dare do this?       >>>       >>> Only if they'll completely ignore the ridiculous drug-induced book /       >>> previous movie and have it actually make sense ... and leave out the       >>> mind-numbingly idiotic 30-minute docking sequence set to ballet music!       >>       >> Then its not '2001'!       >       > That was the point. There's zero point in remaking that drug-induced       > nonsense - it'll never make sense no matter how many times they try to       > do it. :-p              Come to think of it, they did try to remake it ... it was called       "Interstellar". ;-) Another movie that started off okay, but went       with wacky nonsense at the end.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca