Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.movies    |    Discussing SF motion pictures    |    28,343 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 27,800 of 28,343    |
|    Jack Bohn to evelynchim...@gmail.com    |
|    Re: Comments on the 1945 Retro Hugo Nomi    |
|    12 Mar 20 08:53:05    |
      From: jack.bohn64@gmail.com              evelynchim...@gmail.com wrote:       > On Friday, February 28, 2020 at 12:09:16 PM UTC-5, Jack Bohn wrote:       > > >        > > There was a three-volume index of SF and fantasy films in my local library       in the early '70s... A search shows it was _Reference Guide to Fantastic       Films: Science Fiction, Fantasy, & Horror_ by Walt Lee. As you might guess,       to fill three volumes in        those pre-Star Wars days, he cast his net widely, including as fantastic       content dream sequences, superspy devices, including the macguffin device -one       searched for and fought over, but not used- speculative geography (made up       countries), even talking        animals in cartoon shorts. He even included the fake haunting films, as, for       a portion of the running time, the possibility that they were real was       entertained. I'm not sure where he would have drawn the line between madness       and simple murder as horror        films. A long-winded way of saying that although I liked BLUEBEARD, I don't       feel it qualifies. Nor MURDER IN THE BLUE ROOM if it is substantially similar       to the earlier SECRET OF THE BLUE ROOM.       > >        > Ah, yes--we have those volumes also.       >        > Basically, Mark included everything from Tom Weaver’s POVERTY ROW HORRORS!       and from UNIVERSAL HORRORS by John Brunas, Tom Brunas, and Tom Weaver. People       are of course free to say some of these are not SFF and not nominate them.       >        > By the way, I will be adding an appendix/supplement with a half dozen or so       fantasy films that we missed.              That would be interesting. I don't have those books, but a secondary online       source: a fellow's reviews of as many of the movies listed as he can find, the       index of which is conveniently dated. Well, almost. Two additions I would       have made to 1944, I        see from IMDb, one was released in December of '43, the other January of '45.        This suggests I should also check for false negatives he lists as 1943 and       1945.              --        -Jack              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca