XPost: rec.arts.sf.written, alt.atheism   
   From: notonyourlife@no.no.no.no   
      
   On 2021-02-01 12:54 p.m., aaa wrote:   
   > On 2021-02-01 3:52 p.m., Alan Baker wrote:   
   >> On 2021-02-01 12:46 p.m., aaa wrote:   
   >>> On 2021-02-01 3:27 p.m., Alan Baker wrote:   
   >>>> On 2021-02-01 11:58 a.m., aaa wrote:   
   >>>>> On 2021-02-01 1:28 p.m., Alan Baker wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 2021-02-01 7:52 a.m., aaa wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Emergent properties and 'Acts of God' could easily be   
   >>>>>>>> mistaken for each other.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> So you see I'm saying what religion has been witnessing   
   >>>>>>>> as 'Acts of God' are in fact Acts of Nature.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Completely different things. Creation is fundamentally different   
   >>>>>>> from emergence. They are not the same thing. Science ignores   
   >>>>>>> creation by assuming it the same as emergence. That's why science   
   >>>>>>> is wrong, and evolution is imaginary.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> "Evolution is imaginary."?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Now I know how rational you are.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Thanks.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> You are welcome. Now I know how irrational and ignorant you are.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> As in not irrational and not ignorant.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> I bet you don't even know that evolution is actually a false   
   >>>>> philosophical theory of life either.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Evolution is as close to a fact as anything non-trivial can be.   
   >>>   
   >>> How sad you can only ignore my simple philosophical education to   
   >>> insist on your ignorance.   
   >>   
   >> You've provided nothing buy meaningless buzzwords.   
   >   
   > You only expose your lack of philosophical understanding.   
   >   
      
   And you show I was right.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)