Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.movies    |    Discussing SF motion pictures    |    28,343 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 28,115 of 28,343    |
|    Jack Bohn to All    |
|    Cinematic Robots: Robot Cops, plus impla    |
|    06 Oct 22 08:27:07    |
      From: jack.bohn64@gmail.com              [Posted before the movies, because part of the reason is to alert those who       can watch them.]              We have THX 1138 by George Lucas. (Presumably another movie of his with       robots would have been too expensive to get, while this one had been       co-produced by Warner Brothers.) The robot police officers are a minimal       effort, hiring physically imposing        actors such as Robert Feero and Johnny Weissmuller, Jr and dressing them in       uniforms that cover the whole body except the face, which has a metallic       mask. We meet a man who says he is a hologram; I've never decided whether he       just means a hologram star,        and only as unreal as a TV star, or whether he means he is a total fiction.        We do get to see the state of early 1970s technology, as he filmed operation       of remote manipulators for radioactive material -- that in-story these are       building the robot        policemen is slightly worrisome. Is the population of this future       roboticized? Do you see a difference between being roboticized and being       sheepified? I see them not as being forced to do things they otherwise       wouldn't do, but being kept from doing        things they otherwise would do. The main computer, OMM (voice of James       Wheaton) seems to have happiness --within the order of society-- as a goal.                            Robocop and the wonderful Enforcement Droid ED 209. But it does show the need       for a better expert system about law enforcement, and also a unit more compact       and humaniform. If it were easier to interface with a mind than it would be       to program, the        answer would be easy: use the brain of a slain officer for its knowledge and       run the rest by computer. Eventually the other life experiences also come to       the fore, and the Robocop becomes a cybernetic full-body transplant for the       man.                     Tuesday we have "Mad Love" (1935), not really involved, but about a hand       transplant in the genre "it has a mind of its own." (There's gotta be a joke       there about having more brains in its little finger than in the rest of the       body.) Thematically, such a        story is stronger when the intrusive part of the body is an operator, like the       hand, a witness, like the eye, or a motivator, like the heart. The concern       may be harder to express over the liver or a knee. Simple artificial       replacements don't seem to        have this problem: a pirate's hook or pegleg doesn't seem to make him more a       "man of oak" than another sailor, but as they start getting more complex,       although not even close to a biological unit, the fear creeps back in. I'm       trying to think of a movie        or show where a person's mechanical parts "took over," or were even taken over       from the outside, but nothing's coming to mind. There's "The Terminal Man"       owned by WB that could have been thrown into this month, but there's a couple       minute segment in "       THX" that covers about everything in that 107 minute movie except the approach       to a pun on the word "terminal."              Thursday and not part of the celebration is "The Devil-Doll" (1936). Let me       see if I can keep this short: a businessman framed for embezzlement was sent       to Devil's Island. He escapes back to France with a somewhat mad scientist       who was probably        suspected in disappearances of persons as his test subjects. They go to his       house, where his wife has been carrying on their work: shrinking living       creatures; she thinks she has made the breakthrough tonight, so they test it       on a servant, alas, no,        still when the brain gets too small it can no longer think for itself,       although the body will respond to strong mental impulses of others. "But       that's murder," says the businessman in unironic horror, until he realizes how       he can use this in his own        plan to kill those who set him up. He will borrow the collection they've       amassed of tiny animals and people, and sell them as lifelike performing       dolls. When he gets them into the houses of his targets, they will perform a       task for him!       My whole post has been about the subject of actors playing robots. This movie       shows small automata imitating humans and being faked by humans -- portrayed       by actors! Admittedly, the technology allowing humans to portray dolls here       is probably further        out of reach than just building a mechanical toy, but it's the concern behind       it that counts, isn't it?                            Score: THX's robotic cops (like Metropolis's Maria, there does not seem to be       a name given in the film, there doesn't seem to be a half dozen alternatives       vying to be the "official" one, I guess obsessively giving names and backstory       to background        characters is reserved to a different Lucas film) a minimal effort, but still       a detectible effort, with less money or thought, the actors could have just       tried to keep their faces impassive; somewhere just above 0.1.              Robocop: in-story it is a man in a tin suit... well, parts of a man. Still,       my rating system can be used on cyborgs as well as robots: The Six Million       Dollar Man's limbs being portrayed by the actor's, with an occasional wire       sticking out, versus this        half-million dollar costume. Of course, all cyborgs have a built in excuse       for looking as human as the story's tech level allows. (Eventually I'll get       to the rant on the naive "I built a robot, so of course I gave it skin, and a       nose, and individual        hairs.") Robocop was designed to be a robot, but able to use the existing       stock of cop weaponry, and drive a cop car, with a cop motor, cop tires. cop       suspension, cop shocks. (Actually, the Robocop suit couldn't sit in the cars       they had. Peter Weller        merely wore the top half that could be seen through the window; an insert shot       of the door opening and a mechanical foot planting itself on the pavement,       then a cut to Weller standing up in the full suit gave the impression that the       robot was functioning        in the human-sized world. I'll score Robocop around Maria's 0.3.              ED 209: Well, it's not a person in a tin suit. I think I heard that there was       a full-scale mockup, but in action it was a stop-motion figure. So 1.0? No,       there's still the aspect of believing it's a robot. I want to leave a little       room above the ED        for others. There's still people-in-robot-costumes above Robby's 0.5, and I       haven't really explored these higher reaches, so I'll slot ED-209 around 0.9       or 0.95.              --        -Jack              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca