Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.movies    |    Discussing SF motion pictures    |    28,343 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 28,156 of 28,343    |
|    Paul S Person to All    |
|    Hollow Moons and Wandering Earths    |
|    17 May 23 14:09:39    |
      From: psperson@old.netcom.invalid              Some ruminations on two films I saw recently but have no intention of       buying on disc.              /Moonfall/       This is not a bad Emmerich film. /10,000 BC/ and /Anonymous/ were bad       Emmerich films. But it isn't a really good one either.              If you are hoping for something like, say, /The Day After Tomorrow/ or       /2012/, you may be disappointed. You will see characters and events       that, in many cases, appear to be based on other films. In fact, there       isn't much left over.              Except for the Moon itself. It is a "construct", that is, it is       artificial with an outer disguise. IOW, if you have ever wondered what       the Moon in Weber's /Mutineers Moon/ might look like on the Silver       Screen, this will give you some idea. Not as Weber imagined it, to be       sure, and the plot is completely different, with the Machines       operating on a Universal scale and looking like the nanobots in the       remake of /The Day the Earth Stood Still/.              As I said, "other films". No real coherence or particularly memorable       characters here.               /The Wandering Earth II/       When I saw this, I was surprised to see that it was a prequel and not       a sequel. I was also disappointed at it.               This basically documents how the Wandering Earth Project (and MOSS)       came to be and traces it through several crises. Including some very       well organized physical attacks. But it simply doesn't match the level       of energy I remember from the first film, although reviewing the       Wikipedia plot summary of the original suggests that seeing this first       make make it more understandable.              Part of the problem -- for me -- was that each crisis is not only       foretold, but an actual on-screen /countdown/ appears. This greatly       reduces the level of tension especially since, having seen the first       film, we know each crisis must be resolved in a satisfactory manner.              OTOH, if you are wondering about the science behind this endeavor, the       film does go into more detail of how they planned to do it. I'm not       sure how well it would actually work, but it isn't as simple as       stopping the Earth and heading off directly away from the Sun. It's       more like expanding the orbit, getting velocity boosts from gravity,       and accelerating/coasting/decelerating to reach their destination.       Whether the time said to be needed is realistic I have no idea.              It is, IOW, about the launch of a really big Generation Ship. And the       first film showed that Generation Ship encountering Jupiter, with       members of the first generation playing an unexpected part.       --        "In this connexion, unquestionably the most significant        development was the disintegration, under Christian       influence, of classical conceptions of the family and       of family right."              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca