From: psperson@old.netcom.invalid   
      
   On Thu, 30 May 2024 06:03:54 +0000,   
   danmin@danminart-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Danart) wrote:   
      
   >   
   > > Rockinghorse Winner wrote:   
   > > The new Disney adaptation of the evergreen children's story is   
   > > being panned by reviewers all over the internet as woke trash, that   
   >further   
   > > tarnishes the Disney brand. It currently has a 20% favoarable   
   >rating on   
   > > Rotten Tomatoes. Released direct to cable, it seems some in   
   >corporate knew   
   > > enough than to release it to theaters, so it could suffer it's   
   >ignominy in   
   > > relative privacy. Choosing to update the cultural aesthetic to 21st   
   >c norms,   
   > > while keeping the Edwardian setting of the original book, all it   
   >succeeds at   
   > > doing is creating a cringe-fest that makes you feel embarassed for   
   >everyone   
   > > involved.   
   >   
   >Why does it have to be a remake? Why   
   >not just fill in the gap between or after the following. Even a story   
   >before the before.   
      
   Disney still thinks remakes are worth doing.   
      
   -or-   
      
   Disney is suffering from a total lack of imagination   
      
   >"Fox-five Peter-Pan"   
   >   
   >and    
   >   
   >"Hook"   
   >   
   >Or make it a horror story like "Pan's Labyrinth".   
      
   That Pan was not named Peter.    
      
   Nice try though   
      
   >This is a response to the post seen at:   
   >http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=644804354#644804354   
   >   
   --    
   "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,   
   Who evil spoke of everyone but God,   
   Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)