From: YourName@YourISP.com   
      
   On 2024-05-30 15:31:57 +0000, Paul S Person said:   
   > On Thu, 30 May 2024 06:03:54 +0000,   
   > danmin@danminart-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Danart) wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> Rockinghorse Winner wrote:   
   >>> The new Disney adaptation of the evergreen children's story is   
   >>> being panned by reviewers all over the internet as woke trash, that   
   >>> further tarnishes the Disney brand. It currently has a 20% favoarable   
   >>> rating on Rotten Tomatoes. Released direct to cable, it seems some in   
   >>> corporate knew enough than to release it to theaters, so it could   
   >>> suffer it's ignominy in relative privacy. Choosing to update the   
   >>> cultural aesthetic to 21st c norms, while keeping the Edwardian setting   
   >>> of the original book, all it succeeds at doing is creating a   
   >>> cringe-fest that makes you feel embarassed for everyone involved.   
   >>   
   >> Why does it have to be a remake? Why not just fill in the gap between   
   >> or after the following. Even a story before the before.   
   >   
   > Disney still thinks remakes are worth doing.   
   >   
   > -or-   
   >   
   > Disney is suffering from a total lack of imagination   
      
   Neither of those is unique to just Disney. About 90% of lazy-ass   
   Hollyweird suffers from those same things too.  :-(   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)