From: pianoforte109@yahoo.com   
      
   On 8/15/23 5:13 PM, Art Sackman wrote:   
   > On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 2:42:21 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:   
   >> On 8/14/23 1:14 PM, ScottW wrote:   
   >>> As RedState reported, Hunter Biden’s legal team has settled on a   
   >>> new tactic. Namely, they are suggesting that the incredibly   
   >>> controversial and unprecedented diversion agreement, which grants   
   >>> broad immunity to the president’s son, is binding and in effect.   
   >>>   
   >>> Who needs a judge's ok? Not the Bidens.   
   >> Show me where it says that:   
   >>   
   >   
   > In the new court filing, Biden lawyer Christopher Clark wrote that   
   > his client “intends to abide by the terms of the Diversion Agreement   
   > that was executed at the July 26 hearing by the Defendant, his   
   > counsel, and the United States,” adding: “The parties have a valid   
   > and binding bilateral Diversion Agreement.”   
      
   Thank you, I already quoted the original document. This confirms that   
   Biden's lawyers claim the agreement was made with the prosecution and   
   didn't involve the judge.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)