home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.audio.opinion      Everybody's two bits on audio in your ho      255,659 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 253,781 of 255,659   
   mINE109 to ScottW   
   Re: What a surprise   
   17 Aug 23 13:13:45   
   
   From: pianoforte109@yahoo.com   
      
   On 8/17/23 12:54 PM, ScottW wrote:   
   > On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 10:36:50 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:   
   >> On 8/17/23 11:13 AM, ScottW wrote:   
   >>> On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 5:04:03 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:   
   >>>> On 8/16/23 11:17 PM, Art Sackman wrote:   
   >>>>>> Thank you, I already quoted the original document. This confirms that   
   >>>>>> Biden's lawyers claim the agreement was made with the prosecution and   
   >>>>>> didn't involve the judge.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Duh!!!! That's the normal course of business.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> that is typically how it us.   
   >>>>> JUDGES DO NOT NEGOTIATE PLEA DEALS.   
   >>>>> They are negotiated between prosecution and defense attorneys.   
   >>>>> BUT, they are subject to the eventual acceptance or rejection ut the   
   judge,   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> YOU   
   >>>> You wouldn't go wrong if you made it a practice to edit out anything   
   >>>> you've typed in all-caps.   
   >>>>> A plea deal not is NOT a binding contract, if NOT accepted by the judge.   
   >>>> Hunter's lawyers are saying they have a valid diversion agreement, not a   
   >>>> plea deal, which does not require a judge's approval.   
   >>>   
   >>> Stephen doesn't understand, Judges can't file charges.   
   >> Who mentioned charges?   
   >   
   > You were your teacher's worst nightmare.   
      
   Good answer! The filing:   
      
      1 The Government stated in open court   
          that the Diversion Agreement was a   
          “bilateral agreement between the   
          parties” that “stand[s] alone” from the   
          Plea Agreement, and that it was “in   
          effect” and “binding.” (Hr’g Tr.   
          46:9–14) (Government: “Your Honor, I   
          believe that this is a bilateral   
          agreement between the parties that the   
          parties view in their best interest.”);   
          id. at 91:6–8 (Government: “Your Honor,   
          the Diversion Agreement is a contract   
          between the parties so it’s in effect   
          until it’s either breached or a   
          determination [sic], period.”)...   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca