home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.audio.opinion      Everybody's two bits on audio in your ho      255,659 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 253,802 of 255,659   
   Art Sackman to All   
   Re: What a surprise   
   18 Aug 23 21:22:59   
   
   From: arthursackman@gmail.com   
      
   On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 8:04:03 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:   
   > On 8/16/23 11:17 PM, Art Sackman wrote:    
   > >> Thank you, I already quoted the original document. This confirms that    
   > >> Biden's lawyers claim the agreement was made with the prosecution and    
   > >> didn't involve the judge.    
   > >    
   > > Duh!!!! That's the normal course of business.    
   > >    
   > > that is typically how it us.    
   > > JUDGES DO NOT NEGOTIATE PLEA DEALS.    
   > > They are negotiated between prosecution and defense attorneys.    
   > > BUT, they are subject to the eventual acceptance or rejection ut the   
   judge,    
   > >    
   > > YOU   
   > You wouldn't go wrong if you made it a practice to edit out anything    
   > you've typed in all-caps.   
   > > A plea deal not is NOT a binding contract, if NOT accepted by the judge.   
   > Hunter's lawyers are saying they have a valid diversion agreement, not a    
   > plea deal, which does not require a judge's approval.   
      
      
      
   Have you totally lost your mind?   
   There is no diversion agreement without a plea deal.   
   There is nothing to divert without a plea deal, and subsequent sentencing by a   
   judge.   
   The diversion agreement does not sit outside a plea deal.   
   No plea deal, no sentence.   
   No sentence, no diversion agreement.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca