Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.audio.opinion    |    Everybody's two bits on audio in your ho    |    255,659 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 253,802 of 255,659    |
|    Art Sackman to All    |
|    Re: What a surprise    |
|    18 Aug 23 21:22:59    |
      From: arthursackman@gmail.com              On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 8:04:03 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:       > On 8/16/23 11:17 PM, Art Sackman wrote:        > >> Thank you, I already quoted the original document. This confirms that        > >> Biden's lawyers claim the agreement was made with the prosecution and        > >> didn't involve the judge.        > >        > > Duh!!!! That's the normal course of business.        > >        > > that is typically how it us.        > > JUDGES DO NOT NEGOTIATE PLEA DEALS.        > > They are negotiated between prosecution and defense attorneys.        > > BUT, they are subject to the eventual acceptance or rejection ut the       judge,        > >        > > YOU       > You wouldn't go wrong if you made it a practice to edit out anything        > you've typed in all-caps.       > > A plea deal not is NOT a binding contract, if NOT accepted by the judge.       > Hunter's lawyers are saying they have a valid diversion agreement, not a        > plea deal, which does not require a judge's approval.                            Have you totally lost your mind?       There is no diversion agreement without a plea deal.       There is nothing to divert without a plea deal, and subsequent sentencing by a       judge.       The diversion agreement does not sit outside a plea deal.       No plea deal, no sentence.       No sentence, no diversion agreement.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca