From: pianoforte109@yahoo.com   
      
   On 8/19/23 8:49 PM, ScottW wrote:   
   > On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 6:28:40 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:   
   >> On 8/18/23 11:49 PM, ScottW wrote:   
   >>> On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 10:52:39 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:   
   >>>> On 8/18/23 11:04 AM, Fascist Flea wrote:   
   >>>>> Witlessidiot opens their maw extra-wide to swallow a huge fish story.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> I count 11 bitch-posts so far today. Their record is probably over 20,   
   >>>>>>> so maybe it's time for a new retch-peak. Go, scottie! Puke, puke, puke!   
   >>>>>> Here's number 12 for you my bitch.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Joe's e-mail and phone records from the number of the phone Hunter gave   
   Joe   
   >>>>>> show he was giving Hunter classified intel briefing   
   >>>>>> material. JusttheNews will be releasing a detailed chronology soon.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>> I offer a wager: If this turns out to be nonsense with no basis in fact,   
   >>>>> you will disappear from RAO for 7 days. If it turns out to be at least   
   >>>>> half true, I will do the same. Bet?   
   >>>> Proving Joe called Hunter daily, which everyone already knows, isn't the   
   >>>> same as proving "he was giving Hunter classified intel briefing material."   
   >>>   
   >>> Duh.....   
   >> Then why are you so sure a chronology showing daily phone calls prove   
   >> Joe Biden gave a detailed report of anything he did that day, including   
   >> classified material?   
   >   
   > I said e-mail AND phone records which include texts and other forms of   
   messaging.   
   >   
   > I know you're old and anything beyond a phone call is confusing you.   
      
   Joe Biden's even older. However, the same principle applies: frequent   
   communication with a family member is not proof of disclosure of   
   classified material.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)