From: ScottW48@hotmail.com   
      
   On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 10:51:20 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:   
   > On 9/2/23 6:24 PM, ScottW wrote:    
   > > On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 12:30:37 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:    
   > >> On 9/2/23 11:35 AM, ScottW wrote:    
   >    
   > >>> Sure....it is possible that Shokin was corrupt and was "shaking    
   > >>> down" Zlochevsky. But that doesn't mean it is inconceivable that    
   > >>> Zlochesky paid the Biden's to have him removed.    
   > >> So he could continue to not be effectively prosecuted?    
   > >    
   > > or stolen from....depending on your POV.   
   > Shokin was bought and paid for, thus not a threat to Zlochevsky.   
      
   Did you miss the part where his personal assets were seized by Shokin?   
   GMAFB.   
   > >> What was the EU and IMF's stake?    
   > >    
   > > No stake....they weren't available for purchase like the Biden    
   > > franchise.   
   > Then why were they calling for Shokin's ouster?   
      
   Who knows...following in Joe's footsteps as they milked the US defense budget   
   to support NATO is one plausible explanation.   
      
   ScottW   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)