From: pianoforte109@yahoo.com   
      
   On 9/3/23 4:47 PM, ScottW wrote:   
   > On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 10:51:20 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:   
   >> On 9/2/23 6:24 PM, ScottW wrote:   
   >>> On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 12:30:37 PM UTC-7, mINE109   
   >>> wrote:   
   >>>> On 9/2/23 11:35 AM, ScottW wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>>> Sure....it is possible that Shokin was corrupt and was   
   >>>>> "shaking down" Zlochevsky. But that doesn't mean it is   
   >>>>> inconceivable that Zlochesky paid the Biden's to have him   
   >>>>> removed.   
   >>>> So he could continue to not be effectively prosecuted?   
   >>>   
   >>> or stolen from....depending on your POV.   
   >> Shokin was bought and paid for, thus not a threat to Zlochevsky.   
   >   
   > Did you miss the part where his personal assets were seized by   
   > Shokin? GMAFB.   
      
   A slap on the wrist.   
      
   >>>> What was the EU and IMF's stake?   
   >>>   
   >>> No stake....they weren't available for purchase like the Biden   
   >>> franchise.   
   >> Then why were they calling for Shokin's ouster?   
   >   
   > Who knows...   
      
   They do. Something to do with corruption and unwillingness to prosecute   
   crime figures like Zlochevsky.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)