Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.audio.opinion    |    Everybody's two bits on audio in your ho    |    255,659 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 254,070 of 255,659    |
|    mINE109 to Art Sackman    |
|    Re: Joe and KJP refuse to answer.....aga    |
|    08 Sep 23 09:51:14    |
      From: pianoforte109@yahoo.com              On 9/8/23 1:04 AM, Art Sackman wrote:       > On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 8:41:31 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:       >> On 9/7/23 1:28 AM, Art Sackman wrote:       >>> On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 1:37:08 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:       >>       >>>> At some point, I will decide whether feeding your       >>>> transphobia is worth the effort.       >>>       >>> I don't fear them.       >> Dictionary       >>       >> dislike of or strong prejudice against transgender people.       >>       >> Mirriam-Webster       >>       >> irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against transgender       >> people       >>       >> Dictionary.com       >>       >> an aversion or hostility to, disdain for, or fear of transgender people.       >       > I don't have any aversion, hostility, irrational fear, or discriminate       against transgender people.              Yes, you have hostility. Have you read yourself? And irrational fear,       for which you have been called on repeatedly.              > I do strongly object to behavior that grooms or harms children. I have strong       > objections to an ideology that interferes with the relationships between       children and their parents.       > I object to some specific behaviors, not to any particular group of       > people.              But you assign behavior to groups.              > I believe that gender and biological sex are two distinct things, and that       > in transgender people, there is a discrepancy between the two.       > In terms of sports completions, those are acts of physical feats       > and competition should usually be separated between the two biological sexes.       > Where there are womens' sports, those should be reserved for biological       females.       > To allow biological men to compete with biologoical wmen is a violation of       women.s       > rights. (When n speak of men and women, in such general terms, I refer to       biological women.)              Banning trans from sports violates their rights.              > Transgendered women are not women. They are biological men who self identify       as womwn.       > But the facts are is that they are not women.              Can be solved by hormone testing. Of course, this minor problem is just       a wedge to justify widespread discrimination.              > AS far as sports, I recognize that there are a few sports where biological       women       > and biological men can fairly compete against each other. Such would be auto       racing       > and being a jockey.              Chess, which had a trans ban recently for no good reason.              > You need to face the FACTS. Biological women and transgender women are       different.       > And i give all due respect to biological women, who recognize that       difference and avoid harming       > biological women by taking over their sports.              You have consistently denied the facts shown you.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca