home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.audio.opinion      Everybody's two bits on audio in your ho      255,659 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 254,070 of 255,659   
   mINE109 to Art Sackman   
   Re: Joe and KJP refuse to answer.....aga   
   08 Sep 23 09:51:14   
   
   From: pianoforte109@yahoo.com   
      
   On 9/8/23 1:04 AM, Art Sackman wrote:   
   > On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 8:41:31 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:   
   >> On 9/7/23 1:28 AM, Art Sackman wrote:   
   >>> On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 1:37:08 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>> At some point, I will decide whether feeding your   
   >>>> transphobia is worth the effort.   
   >>>   
   >>> I don't fear them.   
   >> Dictionary   
   >>   
   >> dislike of or strong prejudice against transgender people.   
   >>   
   >> Mirriam-Webster   
   >>   
   >> irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against transgender   
   >> people   
   >>   
   >> Dictionary.com   
   >>   
   >> an aversion or hostility to, disdain for, or fear of transgender people.   
   >   
   > I don't have any aversion, hostility, irrational fear, or discriminate   
   against transgender people.   
      
   Yes, you have hostility. Have you read yourself? And irrational fear,   
   for which you have been called on repeatedly.   
      
   > I do strongly object to behavior that grooms or harms children. I have strong   
   > objections to an ideology that interferes with the relationships between   
   children and their parents.   
   > I object to some specific behaviors, not to any particular group of   
   > people.   
      
   But you assign behavior to groups.   
      
   > I believe that gender and biological sex are two distinct things, and that   
   > in transgender people, there is a discrepancy between the two.   
   > In terms of sports completions, those are acts of physical feats   
   > and competition should usually be separated between the two biological sexes.   
   > Where there are womens' sports, those should be reserved for biological   
   females.   
   > To allow biological men to compete with biologoical wmen is a violation of   
   women.s   
   > rights. (When n speak of men and women, in such general terms, I refer to   
   biological women.)   
      
   Banning trans from sports violates their rights.   
      
   > Transgendered women are not women. They are biological men who self identify   
   as womwn.   
   > But the facts are is that they are not women.   
      
   Can be solved by hormone testing. Of course, this minor problem is just   
   a wedge to justify widespread discrimination.   
      
   > AS far as sports, I recognize that there are a few sports where biological   
   women   
   > and biological men can fairly compete against each other. Such would be auto   
   racing   
   > and being a jockey.   
      
   Chess, which had a trans ban recently for no good reason.   
      
   > You need to face the FACTS. Biological women and transgender women are   
   different.   
   > And i give all due respect to biological women, who recognize that   
   difference and avoid harming   
   > biological women by taking over their sports.   
      
   You have consistently denied the facts shown you.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca