Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.audio.opinion    |    Everybody's two bits on audio in your ho    |    255,659 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 254,071 of 255,659    |
|    ScottW to All    |
|    Re: Joe and KJP refuse to answer.....aga    |
|    08 Sep 23 08:58:13    |
      From: ScottW48@hotmail.com              On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 7:51:16 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:       > On 9/8/23 1:04 AM, Art Sackman wrote:        > > On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 8:41:31 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:        > >> On 9/7/23 1:28 AM, Art Sackman wrote:        > >>> On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 1:37:08 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:        > >>        > >>>> At some point, I will decide whether feeding your        > >>>> transphobia is worth the effort.        > >>>        > >>> I don't fear them.        > >> Dictionary        > >>        > >> dislike of or strong prejudice against transgender people.        > >>        > >> Mirriam-Webster        > >>        > >> irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against transgender        > >> people        > >>        > >> Dictionary.com        > >>        > >> an aversion or hostility to, disdain for, or fear of transgender people.        > >        > > I don't have any aversion, hostility, irrational fear, or discriminate       against transgender people.       > Yes, you have hostility. Have you read yourself? And irrational fear,        > for which you have been called on repeatedly.       > > I do strongly object to behavior that grooms or harms children. I have       strong        > > objections to an ideology that interferes with the relationships between       children and their parents.        > > I object to some specific behaviors, not to any particular group of        > > people.       > But you assign behavior to groups.       > > I believe that gender and biological sex are two distinct things, and that        > > in transgender people, there is a discrepancy between the two.        > > In terms of sports completions, those are acts of physical feats        > > and competition should usually be separated between the two biological       sexes.        > > Where there are womens' sports, those should be reserved for biological       females.        > > To allow biological men to compete with biologoical wmen is a violation of       women.s        > > rights. (When n speak of men and women, in such general terms, I refer to       biological women.)       > Banning trans from sports violates their rights.       > > Transgendered women are not women. They are biological men who self       identify as womwn.        > > But the facts are is that they are not women.       > Can be solved by hormone testing. Of course, this minor problem is just        > a wedge to justify widespread discrimination.       > > AS far as sports, I recognize that there are a few sports where biological       women        > > and biological men can fairly compete against each other. Such would be       auto racing        > > and being a jockey.       > Chess, which had a trans ban recently for no good reason.       > > You need to face the FACTS. Biological women and transgender women are       different.        > > And i give all due respect to biological women, who recognize that       difference and avoid harming        > > biological women by taking over their sports.       > You have consistently denied the facts shown you.              https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/trans-woman-wants-ut       rus-transplant-to-have-an-abortion/video/ca537291dfda02241364fee8ba112a00              ScottW              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca