home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.audio.opinion      Everybody's two bits on audio in your ho      255,659 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 254,071 of 255,659   
   ScottW to All   
   Re: Joe and KJP refuse to answer.....aga   
   08 Sep 23 08:58:13   
   
   From: ScottW48@hotmail.com   
      
   On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 7:51:16 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:   
   > On 9/8/23 1:04 AM, Art Sackman wrote:    
   > > On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 8:41:31 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:    
   > >> On 9/7/23 1:28 AM, Art Sackman wrote:    
   > >>> On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 1:37:08 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:    
   > >>    
   > >>>> At some point, I will decide whether feeding your    
   > >>>> transphobia is worth the effort.    
   > >>>    
   > >>> I don't fear them.    
   > >> Dictionary    
   > >>    
   > >> dislike of or strong prejudice against transgender people.    
   > >>    
   > >> Mirriam-Webster    
   > >>    
   > >> irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against transgender    
   > >> people    
   > >>    
   > >> Dictionary.com    
   > >>    
   > >> an aversion or hostility to, disdain for, or fear of transgender people.    
   > >    
   > > I don't have any aversion, hostility, irrational fear, or discriminate   
   against transgender people.   
   > Yes, you have hostility. Have you read yourself? And irrational fear,    
   > for which you have been called on repeatedly.   
   > > I do strongly object to behavior that grooms or harms children. I have   
   strong    
   > > objections to an ideology that interferes with the relationships between   
   children and their parents.    
   > > I object to some specific behaviors, not to any particular group of    
   > > people.   
   > But you assign behavior to groups.   
   > > I believe that gender and biological sex are two distinct things, and that    
   > > in transgender people, there is a discrepancy between the two.    
   > > In terms of sports completions, those are acts of physical feats    
   > > and competition should usually be separated between the two biological   
   sexes.    
   > > Where there are womens' sports, those should be reserved for biological   
   females.    
   > > To allow biological men to compete with biologoical wmen is a violation of   
   women.s    
   > > rights. (When n speak of men and women, in such general terms, I refer to   
   biological women.)   
   > Banning trans from sports violates their rights.   
   > > Transgendered women are not women. They are biological men who self   
   identify as womwn.    
   > > But the facts are is that they are not women.   
   > Can be solved by hormone testing. Of course, this minor problem is just    
   > a wedge to justify widespread discrimination.   
   > > AS far as sports, I recognize that there are a few sports where biological   
   women    
   > > and biological men can fairly compete against each other. Such would be   
   auto racing    
   > > and being a jockey.   
   > Chess, which had a trans ban recently for no good reason.   
   > > You need to face the FACTS. Biological women and transgender women are   
   different.    
   > > And i give all due respect to biological women, who recognize that   
   difference and avoid harming    
   > > biological women by taking over their sports.   
   > You have consistently denied the facts shown you.   
      
   https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/trans-woman-wants-ut   
   rus-transplant-to-have-an-abortion/video/ca537291dfda02241364fee8ba112a00   
      
   ScottW   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca