From: pianoforte109@yahoo.com   
      
   On 9/9/23 10:54 AM, ScottW wrote:   
   > On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 8:44:26 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:   
   >> On 9/9/23 10:31 AM, ScottW wrote:   
   >>> "I just got published in Nature because I stuck to a narrative I   
   >>> knew the editors would like," the article read. "That's not the   
   >>> way science should work."   
   >>>   
   >>> "I left out the full truth to get my climate change paper   
   >>> published," read the headline to an article signed by Brown in   
   >>> the news site The Free Press on September 5.   
   >>>   
   >>> We're all their stooges to be manipulated.   
   >>>   
   >>> I blame a lot of this blatant corruption on the dominance of   
   >>> gov't money funding "research".   
   >> You started a new thread to avoid the previous one?   
   >   
   > Nope...just pointing out that bias has become ingrained in our whole   
   > "science" system when it comes to AGW. It isn't about what he   
   > did....it's how he has come to believe he has to do it.   
      
   The problem is he came to believe this despite the journal asking him to   
   include other factors, which he chose not to do.   
      
   It's not Nature's fault he's projecting his own a priori assumptions on   
   them.   
      
   Also, is The Free Press a "news" site? Looks more like a Bari Weiss   
   Glenn Greenwald wannabe site.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)