Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.audio.opinion    |    Everybody's two bits on audio in your ho    |    255,659 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 254,093 of 255,659    |
|    mINE109 to ScottW    |
|    Re: Some Scientists are little different    |
|    09 Sep 23 12:14:35    |
      From: pianoforte109@yahoo.com              On 9/9/23 11:11 AM, ScottW wrote:       > On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 9:04:09 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:       >> On 9/9/23 10:54 AM, ScottW wrote:       >>> On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 8:44:26 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:       >>>> On 9/9/23 10:31 AM, ScottW wrote:       >>>>> "I just got published in Nature because I stuck to a narrative I       >>>>> knew the editors would like," the article read. "That's not the       >>>>> way science should work."       >>>>>       >>>>> "I left out the full truth to get my climate change paper       >>>>> published," read the headline to an article signed by Brown in       >>>>> the news site The Free Press on September 5.       >>>>>       >>>>> We're all their stooges to be manipulated.       >>>>>       >>>>> I blame a lot of this blatant corruption on the dominance of       >>>>> gov't money funding "research".       >>>> You started a new thread to avoid the previous one?       >>>       >>> Nope...just pointing out that bias has become ingrained in our whole       >>> "science" system when it comes to AGW. It isn't about what he       >>> did....it's how he has come to believe he has to do it.       >> The problem is he came to believe this despite the journal asking him to       >> include other factors, which he chose not to do.       >       > They published it....as is...end of story.              No, it isn't, as it's Brown who's trying to continue it. There's nothing       invalid about the article as far as it went.              If he wants to claim he self-censored, he has to explain why he didn't       revise his study as the reviewer suggested to include additional       factors. And there's no evidence a longer study would have been rejected.              > And it's not the first time Nature has been involved but they are just       another needle in       > a haystack of all needles.              Yes, Nature is often involved in stories involving Nature stories.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca