From: ScottW48@hotmail.com   
      
   On Thursday, September 14, 2023 at 9:47:34 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:   
   > On 9/14/23 10:26 AM, ScottW wrote:    
   > > For excessive radiation. It was called a SARs test in my days of    
   > > working on cellphones. It's a human flesh radiation absorption    
   > > limit for unintended emissions.    
   > >    
   > > Actual comm transmissions are allowed to be higher.    
   > >    
   > > Unintended emissions are largely contained by shielding inside the    
   > > phone. We were working on phone reliability...doing things like temp    
   > > cycling and long term high temp and humidity exposure. After one    
   > > series of environmental stress we sent some phones back to the    
   > > emissions lab for SARs test. They all failed. We sent some more    
   > > that had been through our environmental stress...they too failed. We    
   > > sent some old phones that had been just sitting around for a few    
   > > years. They failed. Legal called....and said stop doing that and    
   > > send us all your documentation. Claimed SARs is a "new" phone only    
   > > requirement.    
   > >    
   > > We tried to get lithium batteries to spontaneously combust too.    
   > > Legal didn't like that either. It's better to not have a record of    
   > > knowing there might be a problem when it comes to determining    
   > > liability.   
   > No NOS sales to France then! Yes, before production would have been    
   > better timing for safety tests.   
      
   It's mandatory.   They did it....and then France did it again with different   
   results.   
      
   ScottW   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)