Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.audio.opinion    |    Everybody's two bits on audio in your ho    |    255,659 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 254,280 of 255,659    |
|    mINE109 to Fascist Flea    |
|    Re: DoJ had investigators on eggshells    |
|    17 Sep 23 13:04:19    |
      From: pianoforte109@yahoo.com              On 9/17/23 12:49 PM, Fascist Flea wrote:       > mINE109 wrote:       >>       >>>> Shapley and Ziegler are leakers, not whistleblowers.       >>>       >>> Like I said....you're truly alone trying to make that silly argument.       >> I'm distinguishing between the informal definition and the legal one,       >> which requires a “protected disclosure” be made to a proper authority.       >>       >> I acknowledge Shaply and Ziegler are informally referred to as       >> whistleblowers.       >>       > At this juncture, a reasoned response would acknowledge that the term       > has, as you point out, different meanings in different contexts. But Scottie       > doesn't earn his "debating trade" points by being reasonable. Maybe they'll       > suggest the Fifth Amendment should shield anyone the LRWEC calls a       > "whistleblower". Or maybe they'll demand that Congress pass a law to       > ban the use of the term in any technical or legal context. Or maybe, if the       > mutt is feeling desperate or cornered, they'll claim sole ownership of the       > word for use against the hated Democrats. If someone tries to blow a whistle       on       > a fuckuplican, Witless will exhort the hated FBI to harass and prosecute the       rat.              They ever find that SCOTUS leaker? Time to edit a judge's robe onto the       hot dog costume meme guy.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca