From: ScottW48@hotmail.com   
      
   The NYT issued an apology for their malfeasance accepting Hamas version of   
   events and inflaming tensions across the mideast as a result.   
      
   The key line..NYT "relied too heavily on claims by Hamas, and did not make   
   clear that those claims could not immediately be verified. The report left   
   readers with an incorrect impression about what was known and how credible the   
   account was. "   
      
   How could the NYT with any rational justification give Hamas credibility to be   
   worthy of reporting at all?   
      
   ScottW   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)