Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.audio.opinion    |    Everybody's two bits on audio in your ho    |    255,659 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 255,024 of 255,659    |
|    mINE109 to ScottW    |
|    Re: Undercover agents likely incited rio    |
|    25 Nov 23 13:32:07    |
      From: pianoforte109@yahoo.com              On 11/25/23 10:41 AM, ScottW wrote:       > On Saturday, November 25, 2023 at 7:12:48 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:       >> On 11/24/23 5:27 PM, ScottW wrote:       >>> On Friday, November 24, 2023 at 1:17:39 PM UTC-8, Trevor Wilson wrote:       >>>> On 25/11/2023 5:58 am, ScottW wrote:       >>>>> When Rasmussen polling asked in April (after the Tucker release): “How       likely is it that undercover government agents helped provoke the Capitol       riot?” 59 percent of Democrats, 62 percent of Republicans and 74 percent of       independents agreed it        was likely.       >>>>>       >>>>> And now we have the release of video of CP randomly launching flash       bangs into a mostly peaceful crowd.       >>>>>       >>>>> ScottW       >>>> **Peaceful?       >>>>       >>>> Are you fucking serious, you moron?       >>>>       >>>> They came armed and acted illegally and violently.       >>>       >>> LIAR.       >> Playing the "not all insurrectionists" card?       >       > Playing the at least one card?       >       > Only person shot on 1/6 was unarmed and shot by CP.              More than one insurrectionist was carrying a gun. Also, "armed" includes       other weapons such as chemical agents and the shields taken violently       from police.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca