home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.audio.opinion      Everybody's two bits on audio in your ho      255,659 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 255,114 of 255,659   
   mINE109 to ScottW   
   Re: Joe's chickenshit Ukraine aid policy   
   04 Dec 23 14:32:55   
   
   From: pianoforte109@yahoo.com   
      
   On 12/4/23 10:12 AM, ScottW wrote:   
   > On Monday, December 4, 2023 at 5:00:35 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:   
   >> On 12/3/23 6:42 PM, ScottW wrote:   
   >>> On Sunday, December 3, 2023 at 1:12:06 PM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:   
   >>>> On 12/3/23 11:34 AM, ScottW wrote:   
   >>>>> On Sunday, December 3, 2023 at 5:59:11 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 12/2/23 9:47 PM, ScottW wrote:   
   >>>>>>> If he would have supplied Ukraine the weapons we're supplying now a   
   year earlier the situation would be very different today.   
   >>>>>> The usual Monday morning quarterbacking.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Such a childish argument. You can't learn from history?   
   >>>> There's more to it than that. You're applying hindsight to decisions   
   >>>> made in real time.   
   >>>   
   >>> BS....Joe's own excuses for why not at the time were proven to be false by   
   Joe himself.   
   >> Sounds like more hindsight.   
   >   
   > As if the benefit of hindsight isn't how decisions in history or judged.   
   > You're just sputtering moronic platitudes cuz you think it sounds like a   
   defense.   
   > It's not.   
      
   It is. You're applying unfair standards.   
      
   >> "[Petraeus] states ... that one of the reasons we have been slow in   
   >> delivering capabilities to Ukraine is that the Chinese said that if we   
   >> held off and slow-rolled some of those deliveries, that they would use   
   >> their influence on Putin to keep him from using tactical nuclear weapons."   
   >   
   > and you believe China?   LoL....   
      
   Since Biden's concern was Russian tactical nukes it makes sense.   
      
   > Why would China want things "slow-rolled"?  Hmmm.....   
   > Gee....what advantage could they find in draining every major adversaries   
   military stocks   
   > in a years long war of attrition?   You think that's going to work out   
   better for your dumb buddy in Australia?   
      
   Not many were expecting a long war of attrition. Again, hindsight.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca