Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.audio.opinion    |    Everybody's two bits on audio in your ho    |    255,659 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 255,114 of 255,659    |
|    mINE109 to ScottW    |
|    Re: Joe's chickenshit Ukraine aid policy    |
|    04 Dec 23 14:32:55    |
      From: pianoforte109@yahoo.com              On 12/4/23 10:12 AM, ScottW wrote:       > On Monday, December 4, 2023 at 5:00:35 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:       >> On 12/3/23 6:42 PM, ScottW wrote:       >>> On Sunday, December 3, 2023 at 1:12:06 PM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:       >>>> On 12/3/23 11:34 AM, ScottW wrote:       >>>>> On Sunday, December 3, 2023 at 5:59:11 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:       >>>>>> On 12/2/23 9:47 PM, ScottW wrote:       >>>>>>> If he would have supplied Ukraine the weapons we're supplying now a       year earlier the situation would be very different today.       >>>>>> The usual Monday morning quarterbacking.       >>>>>       >>>>> Such a childish argument. You can't learn from history?       >>>> There's more to it than that. You're applying hindsight to decisions       >>>> made in real time.       >>>       >>> BS....Joe's own excuses for why not at the time were proven to be false by       Joe himself.       >> Sounds like more hindsight.       >       > As if the benefit of hindsight isn't how decisions in history or judged.       > You're just sputtering moronic platitudes cuz you think it sounds like a       defense.       > It's not.              It is. You're applying unfair standards.              >> "[Petraeus] states ... that one of the reasons we have been slow in       >> delivering capabilities to Ukraine is that the Chinese said that if we       >> held off and slow-rolled some of those deliveries, that they would use       >> their influence on Putin to keep him from using tactical nuclear weapons."       >       > and you believe China? LoL....              Since Biden's concern was Russian tactical nukes it makes sense.              > Why would China want things "slow-rolled"? Hmmm.....       > Gee....what advantage could they find in draining every major adversaries       military stocks       > in a years long war of attrition? You think that's going to work out       better for your dumb buddy in Australia?              Not many were expecting a long war of attrition. Again, hindsight.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca