From: pianoforte109@yahoo.com   
      
     On 1/19/24 5:51 PM, ScottW wrote:   
   > On Friday, January 19, 2024 at 11:39:42 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:   
   >> On 1/19/24 11:23 AM, ScottW wrote:   
   >>> On Thursday, January 18, 2024 at 9:21:30 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:   
   >>>> On 1/18/24 10:19 AM, ScottW wrote:   
   >>>>> On Wednesday, January 17, 2024 at 6:23:01 PM UTC-8, mINE109   
   >>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 1/17/24 4:58 PM, ScottW wrote:   
   >>>>>>> "Today, in response to these continuing threats and attacks,   
   >>>>>>> the United States announced the designation of Ansarallah,   
   >>>>>>> also known as the Houthis, as a Specially Designated Global   
   >>>>>>> Terrorist. This designation is an important tool to impede   
   >>>>>>> terrorist funding to the Houthis, further restrict their   
   >>>>>>> access to financial markets, and hold them accountable for   
   >>>>>>> their actions. If the Houthis cease their attacks in the Red   
   >>>>>>> Sea and Gulf of Aden, the United States will immediately   
   >>>>>>> reevaluate this designation," he continued.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> All these restrictions are futile if they are periodically   
   >>>>>>> removed and allow them to refinance and rearm for the next   
   >>>>>>> round of terrorism. We have morons in charge.   
   >>>>>> For doing what you say is useful? But isn't if in the future   
   >>>>>> they're removed? You might go easier on those in charge if   
   >>>>>> that's the quality of your reasoning.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Thanks for demonstrating how very stupid and apparently   
   >>>>> illiterate a Biden toadie can be.   
   >>>> "All restrictions are futile if they are removed" is more a   
   >>>> demonstration of stupidity than anything I wrote.   
   >>>   
   >>> First who said "all"? You're lying to sound plausible but that's the   
   >>> disingenuous scumbag type of person you are.   
   >> You did.   
   >   
   > Wrong....this is where I get off as you desperately try to spin an important   
   topic   
   > into something completely trivial.   
      
   No, I addressed it directly. You're deflecting by arguing over your own   
   bad attribution. If you wanted to speak to the substance, you wouldn't   
   have snipped my reply.   
      
   > You can take that weak shit and shove it.   
      
   Hey, it's your mistake. If I had said anything so stupid, I wouldn't   
   want to be taken for the author either.   
      
   You'd have saved yourself the grief if you'd quoted.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)