home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.audio.opinion      Everybody's two bits on audio in your ho      255,659 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 255,637 of 255,659   
   Trevor Wilson to The Running Man   
   Re: CD players vs SD players   
   15 Jun 24 11:00:06   
   
   From: trevor@rageaudio.com.au   
      
   On 11/06/2024 10:30 pm, The Running Man wrote:   
   > I'm personally a proponent of SD-card audio players, which have no moving   
   parts, no lasers or servo's to break down or go out of alignment, no spindle   
   motor, no speed deviation.   
   >   
   > I'm both horrified and amused with all the technical solutions manufacturers   
   are advertising that supposedly improve "sound quality". The gist is that   
   you're essentially trying to digital samples. And samples could be stored a   
   variety of ways, on hard    
   disks, flash disks, SD cards and tape if you so desire.   
   >   
   > Systems with no moving parts are obviously the best and most reliable.   
      
   **Indeed. However, several points:   
      
   * The most critical aspects to good sound reproduction lie with the DAC   
   and the output stages. The best DACs are generally regarded to be R2R   
   types. These types of DACs tend to be much larger than the more popular   
   Sigma/Delta types.   
   * RAM based players are not immune from failure of the RAM itself. The   
   type of RAM used has a finite life-span.   
      
   --   
   This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.   
   www.avast.com   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca