Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.audio.opinion    |    Everybody's two bits on audio in your ho    |    255,659 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 255,637 of 255,659    |
|    Trevor Wilson to The Running Man    |
|    Re: CD players vs SD players    |
|    15 Jun 24 11:00:06    |
      From: trevor@rageaudio.com.au              On 11/06/2024 10:30 pm, The Running Man wrote:       > I'm personally a proponent of SD-card audio players, which have no moving       parts, no lasers or servo's to break down or go out of alignment, no spindle       motor, no speed deviation.       >       > I'm both horrified and amused with all the technical solutions manufacturers       are advertising that supposedly improve "sound quality". The gist is that       you're essentially trying to digital samples. And samples could be stored a       variety of ways, on hard        disks, flash disks, SD cards and tape if you so desire.       >       > Systems with no moving parts are obviously the best and most reliable.              **Indeed. However, several points:              * The most critical aspects to good sound reproduction lie with the DAC       and the output stages. The best DACs are generally regarded to be R2R       types. These types of DACs tend to be much larger than the more popular       Sigma/Delta types.       * RAM based players are not immune from failure of the RAM itself. The       type of RAM used has a finite life-span.              --       This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.       www.avast.com              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca