Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.audio.tech    |    Theoretical, factual, and DIY topics in    |    41,683 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 39,731 of 41,683    |
|    Dick Pierce to All    |
|    Re: replacing 10W tweeters with higher R    |
|    29 Mar 10 14:36:23    |
      35cfa6ce       From: dpierce@cartchunk.org              David (World) Reitter wrote:       >       > I measured resistance and couldn't get any current to go through it.              Usually a reasonable indicator of a dead tweeter.              > However, this morning the tweeter in question magically started       > working. I had given it a fair amount of abuse with a vacuum cleaner       > last night (the middle bit of the membrane was pushed in when I bought       > it - Wikipedia tells me this is a dust cap?). I don't what made it       > work suddenly. Resistance of that driver is now showing at a little       > over 4 ohm.              Likely what has happened is some little kid poked his finger       in and collapsed the diaphragm. But, beyond that, it also       sounds like an intermittant electrical failure. The two are       not unrelated: one of the most vulnerable parts of many       tweeters is the short lead-out wire: this gets the most       mechanical abuse, undegoing continuous bending and can weaken       the wire. I've seen innumerable cases where it held on by       the skin of its teeth (actually, the plastic of its insulating),       and would work intermittantly. A stray younger finger would send       it into permanent failure.              Even if you got it working, it's likely you'll need new       tweeters: if my guess is correct, it WILL fail again, and       poking in the tweeter done is likely to have done other damage       as well.              > I'm probably trying to get new tweeters anyways, as these speakers       > still sound very dull unless I boost high frequencies at the source,       > and the high freqs seem louder on one speaker than on the other.       > Would such degradation be typical?              It's not "degredation," it's out-and-out failure.              --       +--------------------------------+       + Dick Pierce |       + Professional Audio Development |       +--------------------------------+              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca