Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.audio.tech    |    Theoretical, factual, and DIY topics in    |    41,683 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 39,968 of 41,683    |
|    Eeyore to Michael Black    |
|    Re: Value of KLH speakers?    |
|    06 Sep 10 05:51:05    |
      From: rabbitsfriendsandrelations@removethishotmail.com              Michael Black wrote:       > On Fri, 27 Aug 2010, Bill Graham wrote:       >       >> That is, (of course) true, but I don't think there IS much stereo       >> content in the bass region.....At least, I don't seem to hear any, so       >> if it exists, it is probably hard to hear.       > It depends on how you define "bass".       >       > The point of subwoofers was to provide that extra low frequency coverage.       > You'd have regular speakers, and then for the even lower frequencies, ie       > lower than good speakers provide, one subwoofer would handle those       > frequencies, and yes, down there it's non-directional.       >       > The concept has been mangled in recent years, with the coming of "computer       > speakers" and "surround sound speaker systems". There, at least in the       > low range, the small speakers won't give much bass, and the "subwoofer"       > is too small to provide extended bass. They are using the "subwoofer"       > to cover what normal speakers would provide, normal "bass". And thus       > except if you spend lots of money, it ruins the whole concept. I've       > seen bigger woofers in "bookshelf" speakers than a lot of those low end       > "subwoofers" and the boxes they are in aren't much better.              'Mangled' is a good description of the state of affairs.              Graham              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca