Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.audio.tech    |    Theoretical, factual, and DIY topics in    |    41,683 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 40,076 of 41,683    |
|    David Nebenzahl to All    |
|    Re: Want to design a 3-way speaker with     |
|    31 Oct 10 18:54:10    |
      ff99cff2       From: nobody@but.us.chickens              On 10/30/2010 6:20 AM ChrisCoaster spake thus:              > Just thought I'd throw this out there - partially to punctuate the       > endless Google Groups posts hocking knock-off handbags and Nike       > merchandise - and to see if this idea might actually go somewhere(!)       >       > I'm thinking about a speaker line, both a bookshelf and a       > floorstanding model. Standard 8-16ohm impedance, current state of art       > materials, with as low-resonance a cabinet as humanly possible.       > Speaker would be a sealed unit, capable of handling anywhere from       > 50-200W.       >       > The two key differences are:       >       > 1. All drivers(2 in the bookshelf and 3 for the floor-standing) would       > be in the same plane. That is, the mid and hf elements would be set       > back so as to be "in lne" with the resting position of the woofer.       > This is not new, and many mfgs have done it for 20 years or more.       >       > 2.(the big one!) - The woofer - and the midrange in the case of the       > floor-standing, would have a range of travel unprecedented for their       > size.              Heh; this reminds me of my own thinking as a kid fooling around with       building speakers[1] and thinking of how to make the "ultimate woofer".              So as absurd as this proposal seems to have been, it raises some       interesting questions (non-absurd, I trust). In particular, if one were       to try to design such an "ultimate woofer", what would be the main       limiting factors to powerful low-frequency response?              1. Cone size (area)       2. Cone compliance (maximum excursion)       3. Motor strength (voice coil size, power capacity, magnet size)       4. Cabinet size & shape       5. Other              (Hopefully Dick Pierce might be interested enough to answer this.)                     [1] My first was an acoustic-suspension bookshelf system, built to plans       in Popular Electronics. I remember getting the 6" woofers, really cheap,       from McGee Radio in Kansas City. They're long gone, of course; anyone       else remember this company? They had an amazing selection of raw       speakers and all kinds of other electronic stuff.                     --       The fashion in killing has an insouciant, flirty style this spring,       with the flaunting of well-defined muscle, wrapped in flags.              - Comment from an article on Antiwar.com (http://antiwar.com)              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca