home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.audio.tech      Theoretical, factual, and DIY topics in      41,683 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 40,076 of 41,683   
   David Nebenzahl to All   
   Re: Want to design a 3-way speaker with    
   31 Oct 10 18:54:10   
   
   ff99cff2   
   From: nobody@but.us.chickens   
      
   On 10/30/2010 6:20 AM ChrisCoaster spake thus:   
      
   > Just thought I'd throw this out there - partially to punctuate the   
   > endless Google Groups posts hocking knock-off handbags and Nike   
   > merchandise - and to see if this idea might actually go somewhere(!)   
   >   
   > I'm thinking about a speaker line, both a bookshelf and a   
   > floorstanding model.  Standard 8-16ohm impedance, current state of art   
   > materials, with as low-resonance a cabinet as humanly possible.   
   > Speaker would be a sealed unit, capable of handling anywhere from   
   > 50-200W.   
   >   
   > The two key differences are:   
   >   
   > 1. All drivers(2 in the bookshelf and 3 for the floor-standing) would   
   > be in the same plane.  That is, the mid and hf elements would be set   
   > back so as to be "in lne" with the resting position of the woofer.   
   > This is not new, and many mfgs have done it for 20 years or more.   
   >   
   > 2.(the big one!) - The woofer - and the midrange in the case of the   
   > floor-standing, would have a range of travel unprecedented for their   
   > size.   
      
   Heh; this reminds me of my own thinking as a kid fooling around with   
   building speakers[1] and thinking of how to make the "ultimate woofer".   
      
   So as absurd as this proposal seems to have been, it raises some   
   interesting questions (non-absurd, I trust). In particular, if one were   
   to try to design such an "ultimate woofer", what would be the main   
   limiting factors to powerful low-frequency response?   
      
   1. Cone size (area)   
   2. Cone compliance (maximum excursion)   
   3. Motor strength (voice coil size, power capacity, magnet size)   
   4. Cabinet size & shape   
   5. Other   
      
   (Hopefully Dick Pierce might be interested enough to answer this.)   
      
      
   [1] My first was an acoustic-suspension bookshelf system, built to plans   
   in Popular Electronics. I remember getting the 6" woofers, really cheap,   
   from McGee Radio in Kansas City. They're long gone, of course; anyone   
   else remember this company? They had an amazing selection of raw   
   speakers and all kinds of other electronic stuff.   
      
      
   --   
   The fashion in killing has an insouciant, flirty style this spring,   
   with the flaunting of well-defined muscle, wrapped in flags.   
      
   - Comment from an article on Antiwar.com (http://antiwar.com)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca