Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.audio.tech    |    Theoretical, factual, and DIY topics in    |    41,683 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 40,086 of 41,683    |
|    Mike Rivers to Randy Yates    |
|    Re: dBFS    |
|    19 Nov 10 17:20:09    |
      XPost: rec.audio.pro       From: mrivers@d-and-d.com              On 11/19/2010 4:33 PM, Randy Yates wrote:              > If an RMS measurement needs to be made for a digital signal (i.e., on a       > digital mixing console or a ProTools plugin), what units are utilized? I       > thought they were dBFS, i.e., that dBFS was an RMS measurement.       > Apparently I am incorrect. Somebody please set me straight.              What, exactly, are you trying to do?              0 dBFS is a peak level. It can be only one sample long, and       you'll never come up with a useful RMS value for that. I       explained some instances where you'd know both the peak       level (full scale) and the RMS value of the waveform with       those peaks. But the two aren't really the same kind of       measurement.                     --       "Today's production equipment is IT based and cannot be       operated without a passing knowledge of computing, although       it seems that it can be operated without a passing knowledge       of audio." - John Watkinson              http://mikeriversaudio.wordpress.com - useful and       interesting audio stuff              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca