Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.audio.tech    |    Theoretical, factual, and DIY topics in    |    41,683 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 40,129 of 41,683    |
|    Peter Larsen to glen herrmannsfeldt    |
|    Re: dBFS    |
|    20 Nov 10 23:37:40    |
      XPost: rec.audio.pro, comp.dsp       From: digilyd@hotmail.com              glen herrmannsfeldt wrote:              > It seems to me that there is still some uncertainty in the       > meaning of dBFS.              No. There are 10 kind of readers here, those that understand binary and       those that do not.              > Well, consider that CDs are considered to have 96dB (or some       > similar number) of dynamic range. That is comparing a full       > scale signal (just about impossible in a live recording)              Oh no, what is difficult to some is to stay in the comfy -10 to -5 zone re.       FS instead of being at 0 dB FS for a number of consecutive samples.              > -- glen'               Kind regards               Peter Larsen              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca