home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.audio.tech      Theoretical, factual, and DIY topics in      41,683 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 40,170 of 41,683   
   Scott Dorsey to yates@ieee.org   
   Re: dBFS   
   22 Nov 10 14:24:14   
   
   XPost: rec.audio.pro, comp.dsp   
   From: kludge@panix.com   
      
   In article , Randy Yates   wrote:   
   >kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) writes:   
   >> [...]   
   >> I just want to reiterate this again.  Unless it is built to a known spec,   
   >> unless it says "LUFS" on the averaging digital meter, or "VU" on the   
   >> averaging analogue meter, then it's not a real measurement, it is only   
   >> usable for qualitative estimation, and it is not to be counted on.   
   >   
   >That's a pretty sad state of affairs for pro audio, don't you think   
   >Scott?   
      
   Not really, since people very seldom really need to know average levels   
   these days.  What is important in the digital world are peak levels and   
   perceived loudness... and dBFS takes care of the first one nicely.   
      
   If you really need to know average levels for some reason, you can buy   
   calibrated meters from Dorrough or RTW which follow the ITU standard.   
   --scott   
      
   --   
   "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca