Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.audio.tech    |    Theoretical, factual, and DIY topics in    |    41,683 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 40,291 of 41,683    |
|    David Nebenzahl to All    |
|    Re: 24-bit on tap at Apple?    |
|    27 Feb 11 17:39:41    |
      XPost: rec.music.gdead, sci.electronics.design       From: nobody@but.us.chickens              On 2/27/2011 9:10 AM Randy Yates spake thus:              > On 02/27/2011 12:04 AM, MalcolmO wrote:       >       >> Hear, hear!       >>       >> Today people get recording contracts based on how photogenic they       >> are. Machines sing them into tune. AND THEN       >>       >>> Most commercial recordings today are released in a form which is       >>> far less than "16-bit" in quality - they have been deliberately       >>> compressed during the mastering process to sound "louder".       >>> They've been quashed, pummeled, clipped, gain-ridden, smelched,       >>> and squeezed down into a tiny dynamic range.       >>       >> And they wonder why we don't buy records!       >       > I thought it may be interesting to suggest some pre-digital era albums that       > were of better source quality than much of what gets put into 1's and 0's       > these days.       >       > How about, "Year of the Cat", by Al Stewart?              I see you, and raise you: John McLaughlin/One Truth Band's "Electric       Dreams", @1979. (Completely analog, so far as I can tell.)                     --       The phrase "jump the shark" itself jumped the shark about a decade ago.              - Usenet              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca