XPost: rec.music.gdead, sci.electronics.design   
   From: askforEmail@gmail.com   
      
   "Trevor"  wrote in message   
   news:4d6b023c$0$2448$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...   
   >   
   > "Randy Yates"  wrote in message   
   > news:8vKdnRKZl8nU__TQnZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@supernews.com...   
   >> Even if the source material was marginal, you'd still have sonic   
   >> advantages with a CD. For example, the elimination of ticks and pops,   
   >> wow-and-flutter, and rumble. But I miss my anti-static gun, dirt   
   >> brush, and Yamaha direct-drive turntable nonetheless... :)   
   >   
   > Gee I sure don't!   
   > And I certainly don't miss the ticks, pops, wow, flutter, and rumble   
   > either. Nor the cost of replacement stylii or cartridges. Or trying to   
   > find decently made vinyl records in the first place! In fact I can't think   
   > of one thing I miss besides the bigger cover art. But the storage hassle   
   > more than negates that IMO.   
   >   
      
   Yet another person that hasn't listened to a recent release on vinyl and   
   compared it to the same release on CD then?   
   You'd be eating your words if you had.  For some reason the sound engineers   
   that mix vinyl, in general, don't compress the hell out of the dynamic range   
   like they do CD.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)