XPost: rec.music.gdead, sci.electronics.design   
   From: TheWholePlanetIsMine@hereandnow.org   
      
   On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 13:03:21 -0000, "David"    
   wrote:   
      
   >"Trevor"  wrote in message   
   >news:4d6b023c$0$2448$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...   
   >>   
   >> "Randy Yates"  wrote in message   
   >> news:8vKdnRKZl8nU__TQnZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@supernews.com...   
   >>> Even if the source material was marginal, you'd still have sonic   
   >>> advantages with a CD. For example, the elimination of ticks and pops,   
   >>> wow-and-flutter, and rumble. But I miss my anti-static gun, dirt   
   >>> brush, and Yamaha direct-drive turntable nonetheless... :)   
   >>   
   >> Gee I sure don't!   
   >> And I certainly don't miss the ticks, pops, wow, flutter, and rumble   
   >> either. Nor the cost of replacement stylii or cartridges. Or trying to   
   >> find decently made vinyl records in the first place! In fact I can't think   
   >> of one thing I miss besides the bigger cover art. But the storage hassle   
   >> more than negates that IMO.   
   >>   
   >   
   >Yet another person that hasn't listened to a recent release on vinyl and   
   >compared it to the same release on CD then?   
   >You'd be eating your words if you had.  For some reason the sound engineers   
   >that mix vinyl, in general, don't compress the hell out of the dynamic range   
   >like they do CD.   
   >   
      
     That depends on the CD.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)