XPost: rec.music.gdead, sci.electronics.design   
   From: trevor@home.net   
      
   "David"  wrote in message   
   news:ikg8j6$dv2$1@news.eternal-september.org...   
   >>>Yet another person that hasn't listened to a recent release on vinyl and   
   >>>compared it to the same release on CD then?   
   >>>You'd be eating your words if you had.  For some reason the sound   
   >>>engineers   
   >>>that mix vinyl, in general, don't compress the hell out of the dynamic   
   >>>range   
   >>>like they do CD.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>  That depends on the CD.   
   >   
   > Which is why I put 'in general' as it has been what I have found more   
   > often than not.   
   > LPs do cost about 3 times the price of CDs now (~£18) but are 'in general'   
   > pressed on good quality heavy weight virgin vinyl.   
      
      
   And are still far inferiror in every technical aspect than a standard CD,   
   *IF* the same music is put on both. Whether it is or isn't is simply a   
   marketing choice.   
      
   Trevor.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)