XPost: rec.music.gdead, sci.electronics.design   
   From: trevor@home.net   
      
   "David"  wrote in message   
   news:ikl2v5$kj5$1@news.eternal-september.org...   
   > That's right Trevor.  *IF* the same were put on both then so it may be   
   > *BUT* it's not!  If you want to go on listening to far inferior recordings   
   > on a possibly better medium then it's up to you, but it's something you   
   > will never know as you have not listened to a recent LP.   
      
   No need, since I regualrly record, mix and/or master CD's myself. I could   
   easily have it cut to vinyl IF there was a market, and the differences would   
   be those required to suit the limitations of vinyl recording/playback.   
   Something I prefer NOT to bother with any more.   
      
      
   > Yes they cost a few bob extra (but we weren't talking about the cost) but   
   > are in general far better recordings.   
   > Oh......and as far as availablility is concerned, nearly all are available   
   > on vinyl.  In fact I first had to buy a CD player only 6 years ago as   
   > there was an album that came out that wasn't n vinyl, a month or two later   
   > it was. Ever since then I've been able to get them all.   
      
   All of what YOU want maybe. But still about 1% or less of what's released on   
   CD every year.   
      
   Trevor.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)