XPost: rec.music.gdead, sci.electronics.design   
   From: trevor@home.net   
      
   "geoff"  wrote in message   
   news:oamdnf2X7fi_svLQnZ2dnUVZ_qGdnZ2d@giganews.com...   
   > Sergey Kubushyn wrote:   
   >>   
   >> That is exactly what some of us, including myself, are doing. As a   
   >> matter of fact it is not just copying to a CD -- they are digitized   
   >> in 24/96 and that digitized material is saved and listened to if   
   >> conditions permit. For everyday use (such as plaing it in one's car   
   >> or whatever) that material is downsampled to 16/44 and put on CDs.   
   >>   
   >> And I betcha they sound light ages better than commercial CDs with   
   >> the same material.   
   >>   
   >   
   > More likely they sound more to your expectaions, which may not necessary   
   > 'better' in terms of true fidelity to the master tape.   
      
      
   Unfortunately many people cannot conceive of the idea that what "sounds   
   better" to them, is NOT actually a more accurate reproduction of the   
   original. Sad really.   
      
   Trevor.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)