XPost: rec.music.gdead, sci.electronics.design   
   From: ksi@koi8.net   
      
   In sci.electronics.design Trevor  wrote:   
   >   
   > "geoff"  wrote in message   
   > news:oamdnf2X7fi_svLQnZ2dnUVZ_qGdnZ2d@giganews.com...   
   >> Sergey Kubushyn wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>> That is exactly what some of us, including myself, are doing. As a   
   >>> matter of fact it is not just copying to a CD -- they are digitized   
   >>> in 24/96 and that digitized material is saved and listened to if   
   >>> conditions permit. For everyday use (such as plaing it in one's car   
   >>> or whatever) that material is downsampled to 16/44 and put on CDs.   
   >>>   
   >>> And I betcha they sound light ages better than commercial CDs with   
   >>> the same material.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> More likely they sound more to your expectaions, which may not necessary   
   >> 'better' in terms of true fidelity to the master tape.   
   >   
   >   
   > Unfortunately many people cannot conceive of the idea that what "sounds   
   > better" to them, is NOT actually a more accurate reproduction of the   
   > original. Sad really.   
      
   Once again -- people listen to the _music_ , not the accurate reproduction   
   or whatever is good on paper. If one likes unhealthy charred barbeque steak   
   there is no reason to persuade him steam boiled vegetables and turkey meat   
   is healthier :)   
      
   ---   
   ******************************************************************   
   *  KSI@home    KOI8 Net  < >  The impossible we do immediately.  *   
   *  Las Vegas   NV, USA   < >  Miracles require 24-hour notice.   *   
   ******************************************************************   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)