Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.audio.tech    |    Theoretical, factual, and DIY topics in    |    41,683 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 40,450 of 41,683    |
|    TheOctavist to All    |
|    Valve Rolling-- Myth or not?    |
|    16 Apr 11 03:09:56    |
      From: luxaeternaaudio@gmail.com              Tube Rolling:-              Valves have certain specs, which all manufacturers of, say, an ECC83 adhere       to in terms of gain, bias sensitivity, mutual conductance etc. All       manufacturers have production spreads, so that a valve may have low gain,       another of the same type higher gain, but still within the acceptable       spread.              Is there any objectove evidence that a say, Mullard, ECC83 is any different       in spreads and performance than any other manufacturer's.              Is there any objective evidence that a say, Mullard, valve will sound any       different to another manufacturer's valve.              Is there any objective evidence that valve circuits are so sensitive to       changing valves unless it's clear that it's due to the valves being at       opposite ends of their production spreads.              How can one valve give better bass han another, given that all they're       doing is modulating DC, and the bass response is due to external components       anyway?              Or is it yet another audiophile myth?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca